Factors Influencing the Success of Non Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases

Objective: This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors influencing the success of nonvascularized iliac bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center, involving 26 patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy followed by nonvascularized iliac bone grafts between 2012 and 2022 at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Buddhachinaraj Phitsanulok Hospital. Data were collected by reviewing electronic medical records and radiographic images. Patients who had received vascularized bone grafts or had a history of head and neck irradiation therapy were excluded from the study. The patients were classified into two groups: successful and failed. Success was defined as clinical and radiographic evidence of bone continuity, a graft resorption rate not exceeding 30% of the initial height, and no evidence of chronic infection for at least 6 months.

Results: Successful bone grafting was achieved in 19 patients (73.1%). Multivariable risk difference regression analysis identified that the factors influencing graft incorporation were jaw immobilization using reconstruction plates with maxillomandibular fixation for at least 21 days (RD 63.0; 95% CI 33.1, 93.0; p<0.001) and long segmental block graft design (51.3%; 95% CI 16.9, 85.7; p<0.003). A clinically significant factor, although statistically insignificant, was the duration of plate stabilization, which should ideally range from 172 to 232 days prior to plate removal. The sample size constituted a limitation of this study.

Conclusions: Nonvascularized bone grafting remains a viable option for reconstructing mandibular segmental defects. The factors influencing graft stability can help improve clinical outcomes.

1. Moura LB, Carvalho PD, Xavier CB, Post LK, Torriani MA, Santagata M, et al. Autogenous non-vascularized bone graft in segmental mandibular reconstruction: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(11):1388-94.

2. Goh BT, Lee S, Tideman H, Stoelinga PJ. Mandibular reconstruction in adults: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(7):597-605.

3. van Gemert JT, van Es RJ, Van Cann EM, Koole R. Nonvascularized bone grafts for segmental reconstruction of the mandible—a reappraisal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(7):1446-52.

4. van Gemert JT, van Es RJ, Rosenberg AJ, van der Bilt A, Koole R, Van Cann EM. Free vascularized flaps for reconstruction of the mandible: complications, success, and dental rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(7):1692-8.

5. Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bone graft materials: an overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:10-27.

6. Marx RE. Bone and bone graft healing. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2007;19(4):455-66.

7. Lawson W, Loscalzo LJ, Baek SM, Biller HF, Krespi YP. Experience with immediate and delayed mandibular reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 1982;92(1):5-10.

8. Gadre PK, Ramanojam S, Patankar A, Gadre KS. Nonvascularized bone grafting for mandibular reconstruction: myth or reality?. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(5):1727-35.

9. Osborn TM, Helal D, Mehra P. Iliac crest bone grafting for mandibular reconstruction: 10-year experience outcomes. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018;8(1):25-9.

10. Akinbami B. Reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible with non-vascularized bone grafts. Systematic literature review. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016;9(3):195-205.

11. Marschall JS, Kushner GM, Flint RL, Jones LC, Alpert B. Immediate reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects with nonvascular bone grafts: a 30-year perspective. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78(11):2099-e1.

12. Dastgir R, Coffey J, Quereshy H, Baur DA, Quereshy FA. Nonvascularized bone grafts: how successful are they in reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects?. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2024;137(5):e63-e72.

13. Brown JS, Barry C, Ho M, Shaw R. A new classification for mandibular defects after oncological resection. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(1):e23-30.

14. Elsalanty ME, Genecov DG. Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2009;2(3-4):125-34.

15. Foster RD, Anthony JP, Sharma A, Pogrel MA. Vascularized bone flaps versus nonvascularized bone grafts for mandibular reconstruction: an outcome analysis of primary bony union and endosseous implant success. Head Neck. 1999;21(1):66-71.

16. Pogrel MA, Podlesh S, Anthony JP, Alexander J. A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55(11):1200-6.

17. Schlieve T, Hull W, Miloro M, Kolokythas A. Is immediate reconstruction of the mandible with nonvascularized bone graft following resection of benign pathology a viable treatment option?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(3):541-9.

18. Maurer P, Eckert AW, Kriwalsky MS, Schubert J. Scope and limitations of methods of mandibular reconstruction: a long-term follow-up. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;48(2):100-4.

19. Baker A, McMahon J, Parmar S. Part I: Immediate reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(11):1333-9.

20. Tidstrom KD, Keller EE. Reconstruction of mandibular discontinuity with autogenous iliac bone graft: report of 34 consecutive patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990;48(4):336-46.

21. Schimmele SR. Part II: Delayed reconstruction of continuity defects of the mandible after tumor surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;59(11):1340-4.

22. Kim Y, Smith J, Sercarz JA, Head C, Abemayor E, Blackwell KE. Fixation of mandibular osteotomies: comparison of locking and nonlocking hardware. Head Neck. 2007;29(5):453-7.

23. Guerrier G, Alaqeeli A, Al Jawadi A, Foote N, Baron E, Albustanji A. Reconstruction of residual mandibular defects by iliac crest bone graft in war-wounded Iraqi civilians, 2006–2011. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53(6):e27-31.

Santiudomchai T. Factors Influencing the Success of Non Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases: Original articles. CM Dent J [Internet]. 2024 Nov 15 [cited 2024 Nov 18];45(3):61-70. Available from: https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=228

& Santiudomchai, T. (2024). Factors Influencing the Success of Non Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases. CM Dent J, 45(3), 61-70. Retrieved from: https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=228

Santiudomchai, T., . 2024. "Factors Influencing the Success of Non Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases." CM Dent J, 45(3), 61-70. https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=228

Santiudomchai, T. et al. 2024. 'Factors Influencing the Success of Non Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases', CM Dent J, 45(3), 61-70. Retrieved from https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=228

and Santiudomchai, T. "Factors Influencing the Success of Non Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases", CM Dent J, vol.45, no. 3, pp. 61-70, Nov. 2024.

Santiudomchai Thanapong "Factors Influencing the Success of Non Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases." CM Dent J, vol.45, no. 3, Nov. 2024, pp. 61-70, https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=228