Remineralization Potential of Nanostrontium/Fluoride Hydroxyapatite on Artificial Enamel Caries
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the remineralization efficacy of nano-strontium/ fluoride hydroxyapatite paste on initial enamel caries in comparison with other remineralization products under a simulated pH-cycling model.
Methods: Following the artificial caries induction, forty enamel specimens with noncavitated lesion in the same range of lesion depth were selected by mean of micro-CT evaluation. The specimens were block-randomized into four experimental groups regarding remineralizing pastes: 1500 ppm sodium fluoride paste, 10%wt nano-hydroxyapatite paste, 10%wt nano-strontium/fluoride hydroxyapatite paste and 5%wt nano-strontium/ fluoride hydroxyapatite paste. Remineralizing effect was evaluated using micro-CT, while SEM/EDS line scan mode facilitated the investigation of remineralization patterns. Changes in lesion depth (ΔLD) and changes in mineral loss (ΔΔZ) were evaluated at 7 and 14 days of treatment under the pH-cycling model. Statistical analyses were performed using 2-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test (p<0.05).
Results: The use of 5%wt nano-strontium/fluoride hydroxyapatite paste significantly reduced lesion depth in initial caries under experimental conditions. Meanwhile, the 10%wt nano-strontium/fluoride hydroxyapatite paste yielded the highest mineral gain, though statistically insignificant. EDS graphs indicated an increasing calcium and phosphorus deposition trend over time with nano-strontium/fluoride hydroxyapatite paste, revealing a more uniform mineral distribution compared to both sodium fluoride and nano-hydroxyapatite pastes. Nevertheless, neither fluorine nor strontium was detectable in these graphs.
Conclusions: The study revealed comparable remineralization efficacy with 5%wt and 10%wt nano-strontium/fluoride hydroxyapatite pastes. The treatment durations of 7 and 14 days showed no significant difference in outcomes.
1. Buzalaf MAR, Pessan JP, Honório HM, Ten Cate JM. Mechanisms of action of fluoride for caries control. Monogr Oral Sci. 2011;22:97-114.
2. Sadıkoğlu IS. White spot lesions: recent detection and treatment methods. Cyprus J Med Sci. 2020;5(3):260-6.
3. Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment and minimal intervention dentistry. Br Dent J. 2017;223(3):183-9.
4. Geeta R, Vallabhaneni S, Fatima K. Comparative evaluation of remineralization potential of nanohydroxyapatite crystals, bioactive glass, casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, and fluoride on initial enamel lesion (scanning electron microscope analysis) – an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(3):275-9.
5. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Flaitz C. Biological factors in dental caries: role of saliva and dental plaque in the dynamic process of demineralization and remineralization (part1). J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003;28(1):47-52.
6. Robinson C, Shore R, Brookes S, Strafford S, Wood S, Kirkham J. The chemistry of enamel caries. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000;11(4):481-95.
7. Arifa MK, Ephraim R, Rajamani T. Recent advances in dental hard tissue remineralization: a review of literature. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12(2):139-44.
8. Walsh T, Worthington HV, Glenny AM, Marinho VC, Jeroncic A. Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3(3):CD007868.
9. Featherstone JD. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J. 2008;53(3):286-91.
10. Featherstone JD. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27:31-40.
11. Robinson C. Fluoride and the caries lesion: interactions and mechanism of action. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2009;10(3):136-40.
12. Koo H. Strategies to enhance the biological effects of fluoride on dental biofilms. Adv Dent Res. 2008;20:17-21.
13. Aoun A, Darwiche F, Hayek SA, Doumit J. The fluoride debate: the pros and cons of fluoridation. Prev Nutr Food Sci. 2018;23:171-80.
14. Martínez-Mier EA. Fluoride: its metabolism, toxicity, and role in dental health. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2012;17:28-32.
15. Hannig M, Hannig C. Nanomaterials in preventive dentistry. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5:565-9.
16. Hannig M, Hannig C. Nanotechnology and its role in caries therapy. Adv Dent Res. 2012;24(2):53-7.
17. Balhuc S, Campian R, Labunet A, Negucioiu M, Buduru S, Kui A. Dental applications of systems based on hydroxyapatite nanoparticles—an evidence-based update. Crystals. 2021;11(6):674.
18. Bordea IR, Candrea S, Alexescu GT, Bran S, Băciuț M, Băciuț G, et al. Nano-hydroxyapatite use in dentistry: a systematic review. Drug Metab Rev. 2020;52(2):319-32.
19. Huang S, Gao S, Cheng L, Yu H. Remineralization potential of nano-hydroxyapatite on initial enamel lesions: an in vitro study. Caries Res. 2011;45(5):460-8.
20. Li L, Pan H, Tao J, Xu X, Mao C, Gub X, et al. Repair of enamel by using hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as the building blocks. J Mater Chem. 2008;18(34):4079–84.
21. Bossù M, Saccucci M, Salucci A, Giorgio GD, Bruni E, Uccelletti D, et al. Enamel remineralization and repair results of biomimetic hydroxyapatite toothpaste on deciduous teeth: an effective option to fluoride toothpaste. J Nanobiotechnology. 2019;17(1):17.
22. Juntavee A, Juntavee N, Hirunmoon P. Remineralization potential of nanohydroxyapatite toothpaste compared with tricalcium phosphate and fluoride toothpaste on artificial carious lesions. Int J Dent. 2021;2021(9):1-14.
23. Huang SB, Gao SS, Yu HY. Effect of nano-hydroxyapatite concentration on remineralization of initial enamel lesion in vitro. Biomed Mater. 2009;4(3):034104.
24. Wang L, Guan X, Yin H, Moradian-Oldak J, Nancollas GH. Mimicking the self-organized microstructure of tooth enamel. J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces. 2008;112(15):5892-9.
25. Tabassum S. Role of substitution in bioceramics. In: Khan AS, Chaudhry AA, editors. Handbook of ionic substituted hydroxyapatites. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2020. p. 117-48.
26. Moloodi A, Toraby H, Kahrobaee S, Razavi MK, Salehi A. Evaluation of fluorohydroxyapatite/strontium coating on titanium implants fabricated by hydrothermal treatment. Prog Biomater. 2021;10:185-94.
27. Wang Q, Li P, Tang P, Ge X, Ren F, Zhao C, et al. Experimental and simulation studies of strontium/fluoride-codoped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with osteogenic and antibacterial activities. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2019;182:110359.
28. Vacharangkura A, Kunawarote S, editors. Effects of experimental nano-hydroxyapatite pastes on remineralization of early demineralized enamel 2021: Rangsit University.
29. Arends J, ten-Bosch J. Demineralization and remineralization evaluation techniques. J Dent Res. 1992;71:924-8.
30. Theuns HM, van Dijk JW, Driessens FC, Groeneveld A. The effect of undissociated acetic-acid concentration of buffer solutions on artificial caries-like lesion formation in human tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol. 1984;29(10):759-63.
31. Huang LH, Sun XY, Ouyang JM. Shape-dependent toxicity and mineralization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in A7R5 aortic smooth muscle cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):18979.
32. Liu Y, Mai S, Li N, Yiu CKY, Mao J, Pashley DH, et al. Differences between top-down and bottom-up approaches in mineralizing thick, partially demineralized collagen scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(4):1742-51.