Comparison of Mechanical Properties Between Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass-ceramic and Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic: A Literature Review

Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (LDS) is increasingly being adopted for use in therapeutic restorative procedures. Concurrently, zirconia-reinforced silicate glassceramics (ZRS) are becoming broadly utilized in dental applications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the mechanical properties of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics and lithium disilicate-based glass-ceramics, with a focus on their application in CAD/CAM technologies. In this review, the researchers conducted a search of the PubMed (MEDLINE) database to identify studies related to LDS and ZRS. This search was limited to articles published in English over a seven-year period, from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2022. Additional studies were sourced from Google Scholar and through manual exploration. Key published works were identified and included in the literature review. The findings concluded that ZRS exhibits superior mechanical properties, including higher flexural strength, fracture toughness, and hardness, compared to LDS. Furthermore, ZRS combines desirable esthetic qualities with robust mechanical strength, rendering it an excellent material for single tooth aesthetic restorations such as inlays, onlays, crowns, and veneers, applicable to both tooth and implant supports. Currently, there is a notable scarcity of data concerning the mechanical properties and clinical efficacy of ZRS. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct long-term clinical studies to verify the optical and mechanical properties, clinical applications, limitations, and long-term effectiveness of ZRS.

1. Kovarik RE, Ergle JW, Fairhurst CW. Effects of specimen geometry on the measurement of fracture toughness. Dent Mater. 1991;7(3):166-9.

2. Chen XP, Xiang ZX, Song XF, Yin L. Machinability: zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic versus lithium disilicate glass ceramic. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;101:1-14.

3. Elsaka SE, Elnaghy AM. Mechanical properties of zirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic. Dent Mater. 2016;32(7):908-14.

4. Traini T, Sinjari B, Pascetta R, Serafini N, Perfetti G, Trisi P, et al. The zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic: lights and shadows of a new material. Dent Mater J. 2016;35(5):748-55.

5. Monteiro JB, Riquieri H, Prochnow C, Guilardi LF, Pereira GKR, Borges ALS, et al. Fatigue failure load of two resin-bonded zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramics: effect of ceramic thickness. Dent Mater. 2018;34(6):891-900.

6. Sen N, Us YO. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):593-9.

7. Zarone F, Di Mauro MI, Ausiello P, Ruggiero G, Sorrentino R. Current status on lithium disilicate and zirconia: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):1-14.

8. Fasbinder DJ. Materials for chairside CAD/CAM restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(9):702-4.

9. Kang SH, Chang J, Son HH. Flexural strength and microstructure of two lithium disilicate glass ceramics for CAD/CAM restoration in the dental clinic. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(3):134-40.

10. Harada K, Raigrodski AJ, Chung KH, Flinn BD, Dogan S, Mancl LA. A comparative evaluation of the translucency of zirconias and lithium disilicate for monolithic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):257-63.

11. Alghazzawi TF. Advancements in CAD/CAM technology: options for practical implementation. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(2):72-84.

12. Rinke S, Rodiger M, Ziebolz D, Schmidt AK. Fabrication of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic restorations using a complete digital workflow. Case Rep Dent. 2015;2015:1-7.

13. Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32(11):275-83.

14. Soliman TA. Flexural strength and adhesion of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic to resin cement after thermo-mechanical load cycling. Egypt Dent J. 2017;63:2785-93.

15. Fischer H, Marx R. Fracture toughness of dental ceramics: comparison of bending and indentation method. Dent Mater. 2002;18(1):12-9.

16. Wang H, Isgro G, Pallav P, Feilzer A, Chao Y. Influence of test methods on fracture toughness of a dental porcelain and a soda lime glass. J AM Ceram Soc. 2005;88(10):2868-73.

17. Fischer H, Waindich A, Telle R. Influence of preparation of ceramic SEVNB specimens on fracture toughness testing results. Dent Mater. 2008;24(5):618-22.

18. Hamza TA, Sherif RM. Fracture resistance of monolithic glass-ceramics versus bilayered zirconia-based restorations. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(1):259-64.

19. Sieper K, Wille S, Kern M. Fracture strength of lithium disilicate crowns compared to polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network and zirconia reinforced lithium silicate crowns. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;74:342-8.

20. Bankoglu Gungor M, Karakoca Nemli S. Fracture resistance of CAD-CAM monolithic ceramic and veneered zirconia molar crowns after aging in a mastication simulator. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):473-80.

21. Mohamed MS, Mohsen CA, Katamish H. Impact of chemical aging on the fracture resistance of two ceramic materials: zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and lithium disilicate ceramics. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2020;8(D):183-93.

22. Schwindling FS, Rues S, Schmitter M. Fracture resistance of glazed, full-contour ZRS incisor crowns. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(3):344-9.

23. Preis V, Behr M, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated ZRS molar crowns. Dent Mater. 2015;31(11):1363-9.

24. Furtado de Mendonca A, Shahmoradi M, Gouvea CVD, De Souza GM, Ellakwa A. Microstructural and mechanical characterization of CAD/CAM materials for monolithic dental restorations. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):587-94.

25. Al-Thagafi R, Al-Zordk W, Saker S. Influence of surface conditioning protocols on reparability of CAD/CAM zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. J Adhes Dent. 2016;18:135-41.

26. Ustun O, Buyukhatipoglu IK, Secilmis A. Shear bond strength of repair systems to new CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(8):748-54.

27. Shono N, Elhejazi A, Maawadh A, Al Nahedh H. Ball-on-three-balls biaxial flexural strength of bonded and unbonded CAD/CAM materials. Ceramics-Silikaty. 2021;66(1):66-77.

28. Van den Breemer CR, Vinkenborg C, van Pelt H, Edelhoff D, Cune MS. The clinical performance of monolithic lithium disilicate posterior restorations after 5, 10, and 15 years: a retrospective case series. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;30(1):62-5.

29. Mobilio N, Fasiol A, Catapano S. Survival rates of lithium disilicate single restorations: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(3):283-6.

30. Garling A, Sasse M, Becker MEE, Kern M. Fifteen-year outcome of three-unit fixed dental prostheses made from monolithic lithium disilicate ceramic. J Dent. 2019;89:1-5.

31. Malament KA, Natto ZS, Thompson V, Rekow D, Eckert S, Weber HP. Ten-year survival of pressed, acid-etched e.max lithium disilicate monolithic and bilayered complete-coverage restorations: performance and outcomes as a function of tooth position and age. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(5):782-90.

32. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(3):227-35.

33. Zimmermann M, Koller C, Mehl A, Hickel R. Indirect zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic CAD/CAM restorations: preliminary clinical results after 12 months. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(1):19-25.

34. Rinke S, Pfitzenreuter T, Leha A, Roediger M, Ziebolz D. Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated partial crowns composed of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramics: 3-year results of a prospective practice-based study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):226-35.

35. Rinke S, Brandt A, Hausdoerfer T, Leha A, Ziebolz D. Clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated partial crowns made of zirconia- reinforced lithium silicate ceramic - 2-year-results. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2020;28(1):36-42.

36. Rinke S, Zuck T, Hausdörfer T, Leha A, Wassmann T, Ziebolz D. Prospective clinical evaluation of chairside-fabricated zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic partial crowns-5-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(2):1593-603.

37. Rodríguez-Rojas F, Borrero-López Ó, Sánchez-González E, Hoffman M, Guiberteau F. On the durability of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate and lithium disilicate dental ceramics under severe contact. Wear. 2022;15(508-509):1-6.

38. Degidi M, Nardi D, Sighinolfi G, Degidi D, Piattelli A. Fixed partial restorations made of a new zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate material: a 2-year short-term report. Int J Prosthodont. 2021;34(1):37-46.

Leelaponglit S, Angkananuwat C, Krajangta N, Paaopanchon C, Ackapolpanich T, Champakerdsap C, Klaisiri A. Comparison of Mechanical Properties Between Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass-ceramic and Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic: A Literature Review: Review articles. CM Dent J [Internet]. 2024 Aug 29 [cited 2024 Nov 18];45(2):13-21. Available from: https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=216

Leelaponglit, S., Angkananuwat, C., Krajangta, N., Paaopanchon, C., Ackapolpanich, T., Champakerdsap, C. & Klaisiri, A. (2024). Comparison of Mechanical Properties Between Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass-ceramic and Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic: A Literature Review. CM Dent J, 45(2), 13-21. Retrieved from: https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=216

Leelaponglit, S., Angkananuwat Chayanit,Krajangta Nantawan,Paaopanchon Chanakan,Ackapolpanich Tanwarath,Champakerdsap Chunya and Klaisiri Awiruth. 2024. "Comparison of Mechanical Properties Between Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass-ceramic and Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic: A Literature Review." CM Dent J, 45(2), 13-21. https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=216

Leelaponglit, S. et al. 2024. 'Comparison of Mechanical Properties Between Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass-ceramic and Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic: A Literature Review', CM Dent J, 45(2), 13-21. Retrieved from https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=216

Leelaponglit, S., Angkananuwat, C., Krajangta, N., Paaopanchon, C., Ackapolpanich, T., Champakerdsap, C. and Klaisiri, A. "Comparison of Mechanical Properties Between Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass-ceramic and Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic: A Literature Review", CM Dent J, vol.45, no. 2, pp. 13-21, Aug. 2024.

Leelaponglit, S., Angkananuwat, C., Krajangta, N., et al. "Comparison of Mechanical Properties Between Zirconia-reinforced Lithium Silicate Glass-ceramic and Lithium Disilicate Glass-ceramic: A Literature Review." CM Dent J, vol.45, no. 2, Aug. 2024, pp. 13-21, https://www.dent.cmu.ac.th/cmdj/frontend/web/?r=site/viewarticle&id=216